Showing posts with label Theology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Theology. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 19, 2009

I am a Fundamentalist, If...


Kevin Bauder in an address he gave in 2005 called, A Fundamentalism Worth Saving, defines the idea of fundamentalism like this:


In answering this question, I first distinguish fundamentalism as an idea from fundamentalism as a movement. As I have said on other occasions, fundamentalism is a great idea. As an idea, fundamentalism is essentially a doctrinal and ecclesiastical reaction against unbelief masquerading as Christianity. Ideal fundamentalists affirm that all doctrine is important, but they recognize that some doctrines are more important than others. They assert that some doctrines are so important as to be essential to the gospel itself. These essential or fundamental doctrines are held to be indispensably bound to the very definition of Christianity. While ideal fundamentalists certainly do not believe that Christianity can be reduced to a doctrinal statement, they affirm that Christianity rests upon an inviolable doctrinal foundation. To add to or subtract from that foundation is to deny Christianity itself. Moreover—and this is the crux of the matter—fundamentalists insist that no Christian fellowship can exist or should be pretended with people who deny the gospel.



This understanding distinguishes fundamentalists from two sorts of religious people. First, it distinguishes them from apostates, or people who deny essential doctrines while claiming to be Christians. Second, it distinguishes them from the people whom J. Gresham Machen called indifferentists, people who personally affirm the fundamentals but who refuse to acknowledge that those fundamentals are essential to the definition of Christianity or the existence of Christian fellowship. Typically, historic fundamentalists have felt themselves duty-bound not only to truncate visible fellowship with those who deny the gospel, but also to limit their cooperation with those whose view of the gospel is so low that they feel they can continue in fellowship with apostates. (read the whole thing here)


If this is fundamentalism. I am a fundamentalist.

Bauder was one of my seminary professors and is now the President of Central Baptist Theological Seminary.

If this topic is of interest to you I recommend reading the following:

Saturday, April 25, 2009

Stay Away from "Shack" Like Thinking


I know this is a little late - The Shack has been out for quite some time. I admit that I have not read the book cover to cover, but I have listened to more than half of it (including the end which has the author's explanation). My wife would say that I have a strong stomach (so does my side of the family) but even I couldn't keep this book down. I couldn't help but gag several times as I contemplated the books sentimental and sappy view of the Trinity. I realize that we often have a wrong view of God and we need our shallow views challenged - but the The Shack's different view is in the wrong direction (think Dr. Phil, Oprah and Richard Simmons).

For a brief intro and perspective on the bad theology of this massively popular book see this video by Mark Driscoll.



If you want to read more on this book from a theological and biblical perspective, I encourage you to read the lengthy review by Tim Challies. If you haven't bookmarked it all ready, his website Discerning Reader is a very helpful website for books.

Monday, July 14, 2008

Good Job, EFCA on Statement of Faith

I am glad to be a pastor in the Evangelical Free Church of America and here is one reason why (read link):
HT: Justin Taylor

http://www.skweezer.com/bloglines/s.aspx/-/www~christianitytoday~com/ct/2008/julyweb-only/129-11~0~html
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry